Skip Navigation


Carcinogenesis Advance Access originally published online on March 19, 2008
Carcinogenesis 2008 29(6):1178-1183; doi:10.1093/carcin/bgn075
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
29/6/1178    most recent
bgn075v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonassi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Boffetta, P.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonassi, S.
Right arrow Articles by Boffetta, P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Chromosomal aberration frequency in lymphocytes predicts the risk of cancer: results from a pooled cohort study of 22 358 subjects in 11 countries

Stefano Bonassi1,*, Hannu Norppa2, Marcello Ceppi1, Ulf Strömberg3, Roel Vermeulen4, Ariana Znaor5, Antonina Cebulska-Wasilewska6, Eleonora Fabianova7, Alexandra Fucic8, Sarolta Gundy9, Inger-Lise Hansteen10, Lisbeth E. Knudsen11, Juozas Lazutka12, Pavel Rossner13, Radim J. Sram13 and Paolo Boffetta14

1 Unit of Molecular Epidemiology, National Cancer Research Institute, Genoa, Italy
2 New Technologies and Risks, Work Environment Development, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Topeliuksenkatu 41 aA, FI-00250 Helsinki Finland
3 Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, S-221 85 Lund, Sweden
4 Environmental and Occupational Health Division, Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, University Utrecht, Utrecht, PO Box 80176, 3503 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands
5 Croatian National Cancer Registry, Croatian National Institute of Public Health, Rockefellerova 7, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
6 Department of Radiation and Environmental Biology, The Henryk Niewodniczanski Institute of Nuclear Physics, PAN, Radzikowskiego Street 152, 31-342 Kraków, poland
7 Department of Occupational Health, Specialized State Health Institute, Banska Bystrica, Slovakia
8 Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, 10 000 Zagreb, Ksaverska c 2 Croatia
9 Department of Diagnostic Onco-cytogenetics, National Institute of Oncology, Ráth Gy. u. 7-9, Budapest 1122, Hungary
10 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Section of Medical Genetics, Telemark Hospital, Skien, Norway
11 Environmental Health Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, Po Box 2099, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
12 Vilnius University, Universiteto 3, 01513 Vilnius, Lithuania
13 Laboratory of Genetic Ecotoxicology, c/o Institute of Experimental Medicine Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Videnska 1083, 142 20 Prague 4, Czech Republic
14 Genetics and Epidemiology Cluster, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69008 Lyon, France

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +390 10 5600924; Fax: +390 10 5600501; Email: stefano.bonassi{at}istge.it

Mechanistic evidence linking chromosomal aberration (CA) to early stages of cancer has been recently supported by the results of epidemiological studies that associated CA frequency in peripheral lymphocytes of healthy individuals to future cancer incidence. To overcome the limitations of single studies and to evaluate the strength of this association, a pooled analysis was carried out. The pooled database included 11 national cohorts and a total of 22 358 cancer-free individuals who underwent genetic screening with CA for biomonitoring purposes during 1965–2002 and were followed up for cancer incidence and/or mortality for an average of 10.1 years; 368 cancer deaths and 675 incident cancer cases were observed. Subjects were classified within each laboratory according to tertiles of CA frequency. The relative risk (RR) of cancer was increased for subjects in the medium [RR = 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.07–1.60] and in the high (RR = 1.41; 95% CI = 1.16–1.72) tertiles when compared with the low tertile. This increase was mostly driven by chromosome-type aberrations. The presence of ring chromosomes increased the RR to 2.22 (95% CI = 1.34–3.68). The strongest association was found for stomach cancer [RRmedium = 1.17 (95% CI = 0.37–3.70), RRhigh = 3.13 (95% CI = 1.17–8.39)]. Exposure to carcinogens did not modify the effect of CA levels on overall cancer risk. These results reinforce the evidence of a link between CA frequency and cancer risk and provide novel information on the role of aberration subclass and cancer type.

Abbreviations: CA, chromosomal aberration; CI, confidence interval; IR, ionizing radiation; RR, relative risk

Received January 18, 2008; revised March 5, 2008; accepted March 6, 2008.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.